In the wake of three successive resignations of high ranking members of the state police in just the past three weeks, there are calls for reforms to increase stability and accountability at the top of the agency. Our Kaitlyn Ross spoke to lawmakers on both sides the aisle who say it's time for a change in how the process is done.

NEW YORK STATE -- "The role of the state trooper is primarily to protect and to serve the public. It is not to protect and serve the political interests of the party that's in power," said Assemblyman Hakim Jefferies.

And with three administrations now accused of improperly influencing the State Police Superintendent for their benefit, Jefferies says it's time for more checks and balances in the system.

"It happened under Governor Pataki, it happened under Governor Spitzer, it may have happened under Governor Paterson. Enough," Jefferies said.

Jefferies and Senator Liz Krueger are introducing legislation that would at least keep a closer eye on the office. Under the plan, the police superintendent would serve one ten year term, appointed by the Governor and confirmed through the legislature. When it comes to removing him from office, that's where the power shifts. Under the Senate plan, the police superintendent could only be removed, with cause, by a majority vote of both houses.

"There's going to be much greater scrutiny and review of how the state troopers are operating," Krueger said.

And also more accountability. The superintendent would be required to present written reports to the legislature every year and appear in person every other year.

"This is not a Republican issue, this is not a Democratic issue, it is a safety issue. The people of New York State deserve better," Jefferies said.

Republicans say they are willing to work with the Democrats on the issue because they already have a bill written.

"Certainly we would welcome their support. We've circulated this legislation in prior years and reintroduced it this year," said Senator Michael Nozzolio.

Under the Republican's plan, the Superintendent would have a fixed term of three years instead of the Democrats proposed 10, but would still be accountable to the legislature.

"We hope that we can see some action here to get to the bottom line of shielding the Superintendent of the State Police from this type of political influence," Nizzolio said.

Both sides say they are willing to work together on this legislation to see that something changes for the next appointment. If passed, the law would be on the books for January 1st, 2011, so a whole new set of rules for the new superintendent coming in.